METHODS OF WEB DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF DATA AND OBJECT TOKENIZATION FOR TRUSTED SOCIAL SERVICES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER NETWORKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.31.1027Keywords:
tokenization; computer networks; distributed networks; web tools; trust metrics; social services; information security; digital assets.Abstract
The article presents a comprehensive study of web development methods and tools for implementing tokenization of data and objects in the Web 3.0 environment, with a focus on the backend level. Modern smart-contract standards ERC-20, ERC-721/1155, ERC-1400/3643, SPL, FA2, and Cadence are analyzed, along with metadata storage approaches (on-chain, IPFS, Arweave), indexing mechanisms such as The Graph, and scaling architectures including L1/L2, zk-rollup solutions, and alternative L1 networks. A classification of token types by purpose and of their implementation methods is developed, as well as a classification of web tools by functional layers, which made it possible to identify specific features and differences in requirements for performance, interoperability, compliance, and information security. The comparative analysis shows that EVM-based implementations are the most mature and optimal for utility tokens, whereas NFT systems impose higher demands on secure off-chain storage, and security and RWA tokens provide regulatory controls and access management at the cost of a lower degree of decentralization. Based on a review of projects, it is shown that second-layer technologies, in particular Polygon zkEVM and Immutable X, reduce gas costs and increase transaction throughput compared to base networks. The paper also proposes a unified formal methodology for testing tokenization processes, which covers verification of operation correctness, state invariants, access policies, cryptographic guarantees, and transaction execution efficiency. The methodology integrates formal models of token behavior with gas-efficiency criteria and enables comprehensive assessment of the reliability of tokenization systems независимо of the underlying standard or technological stack. The results can be used for designing Web 3.0 backend architectures, developing trust-based social services in distributed computer networks, and creating a methodological foundation for automated token testing in multichain ecosystems.
Downloads
References
Ethereum Foundation. (2015). ERC-20: Token standard (EIP-20). Ethereum Improvement Proposals. https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20
Ethereum Foundation. (2018). ERC-721: Non-fungible token standard (EIP-721). Ethereum Improvement Proposals. https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721
Ethereum Foundation. (2019). ERC-1155: Multi token standard (EIP-1155). Ethereum Improvement Proposals. https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1155
Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform (White paper). Ethereum Foundation. https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/
Wood, G. (2019). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger (Yellow Paper, Berlin version). Ethereum Foundation. https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf
ConsenSys. (2023). Ethereum smart contract best practices. ConsenSys Diligence. https://consensysdiligence.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/
Dossa, A., Ruiz, P., Vogelsteller, F., & Gosselin, S. (2018). ERC-1400: Security token standard (EIP-1400, draft). Ethereum Improvement Proposals. https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/1411
Tokeny Solutions. (2023). ERC3643: The T-REX protocol – The token standard for real-world asset tokenization (Whitepaper v4.0). https://tokeny.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ERC3643-Whitepaper-T-REX-v4.pdf
ONCHAINID. (n.d.). Developers, welcome (ONCHAINID technical documentation). ONCHAINID Docs. https://docs.onchainid.com/docs/developers/intro/ (accessed: 20.11.2025)
Tokeny Solutions. (2023). ERC3643: The token standard for real-world assets (RWAs). Tokeny Resources. https://tokeny.com/erc3643-the-token-standard-for-real-world-assets-rwas/
Mell, P., & Yaga, D. (2024). Non-fungible token security (NIST Interagency/Internal Report 8472). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8472
Benet, J. (2014). IPFS – Content addressed, versioned, P2P file system. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1407.3561
Williams, S., Diordiiev, V., Berman, L., Raybould, I., & Uemlianin, I. (2019). Arweave: A protocol for economically sustainable information permanence. Arweave. https://www.arweave.org/yellow-paper.pdf
The Graph Foundation. (n.d.). About The Graph. https://thegraph.com/docs/en/about/ (accessed: 20.11.2025)
Polygon Labs. (2023). Introducing Polygon 2.0: The value layer of the internet. Polygon Technology Blog. https://polygon.technology/blog/introducing-polygon-2-0-the-value-layer-of-the-internet
Immutable Х. (2023). Immutable X Whitepaper. V1.2. https://www.immutable.com/
Solana Labs. (2023). SPL Token-2022 standard documentation. https://spl.solana.com/token-2022
Tezos Foundation. (2022). TZIP-12: FA2 multi-asset interface standard. Tezos Improvement Proposals. https://tzip.tezosagora.org/proposal/tzip-12/
Flow Developers. (2025). Token development and registration: Fungible and non-fungible token standards. Flow Developer Docs. https://developers.flow.com/blockchain-development-tutorials/tokens
OpenZeppelin. (2024). OpenZeppelin Contracts v5.0: Audited Solidity implementations. GitHub repository. https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts
Nomic Foundation. (n.d.). Hardhat 3: Rust-powered Solidity tests Ethereum development environment for professionals. Hardhat documentation. https://hardhat.org/ (accessed: 20.11.2025)
Ethers Project. (2023). ethers.js v6 API documentation. https://docs.ethers.org/
ATNO For Blockchain Developer. (2024). How to Use Truffle and Ganache for Blockchain Development. Medium. https://medium.com/@atnoforblockchain/how-to-use-truffle-and-ganache-for-blockchain-development-712322b9408a
Trail of Bits. (2019). 246 findings from our smart contract audits: An executive summary. Trail of Bits Blog. https://blog.trailofbits.com/2019/08/08/246-findings-from-our-smart-contract-audits-an-executive-summary/
Diligence. (2021). Umbra Smart Contracts. https://diligence.security/audits/2021/03/umbra-smart-contracts/
Feist, J., Grieco, G., & Groce, A. (2019). Slither: A static analysis framework for smart contracts. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Engineering for Blockchain (WETSEB). P. 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/WETSEB.2019.00008
MakerDAO. (2024). The Sky Protocol: Sky's Multi-Collateral Dai (MCD) System. https://makerdao.com/whitepaper/
TRM Labs. (2025). Seize, burn, block, reissue: Understanding the legal tools behind crypto asset recovery. TRM Blog. https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/
Bank for International Settlements. (2024). Tokenisation in the context of money and other assets: Concepts and implications for central banks. https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d225.pdf
Financial Stability Board. (2024). The financial stability implications of tokenisation. https://www.fsb.org/2024/10/the-financial-stability-implications-of-tokenisation/
EUR-Lex (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj/eng
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Володимир Міхав, Єлизавета Мелешко, Микола Якименко, Віктор Босько, Ірина Лисенко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.