METHODOLOGY FOR AUTOMATING CYBER INCIDENT REPORTS USING LLM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.33.1156

Keywords:

threat intelligence, large language models, cybersecurity incidents, reporting

Abstract

The work is devoted to the issues of automation of reporting as part of Threat Intelligence processes. The purpose of the work is to develop a methodology that allows to reduce the burden on employees who process and document the results of cyber incidents in accordance with the requirements of regulatory documents. Among the main results of the work, a reusable instruction template for a large language model (LLM) is proposed. The presented template allows to provide clear instructions, namely required and optional fields, permissible values that are entered into the report fields. Software models based on the Pydantic library are proposed for generating and checking the response in JSON format from LLM. This allows to reduce the length of instructions for LLM by approximately 3 times. A RAG pipeline architecture is proposed to take into account the specific context of regulatory documents in the field of cyber incident reporting. Such a pipeline allows to follow the requirements of legislation and standards without the need to manually prescribe these requirements in the instructions, which speeds up the generation process and improves the quality of reports. A software model has been developed that allows automated generation of a cyber incident report. Such a model does not require manual filling in of incident characteristics, user interaction with the Threat Intelligence platform using the example of MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform). This approach allows reducing the time for creating a report from hours to minutes, and improving the efficiency of exchanging threat data, avoiding time and financial investments. Another result of the work is a comparative analysis of report generation when using different LLMs, in particular Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 2.5 pro, Grok xAI, GPT 5, DeepSeek, Llama in terms of quality and cost of report generation. For comparison, report quality criteria were proposed, and compliance with the criteria was assessed by an expert method. As a result, the Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 2.5 pro models were identified as leaders in terms of the quality of generated reports. It was established that LLMs are a promising tool for implementation in processing and communication processes in the field of cybersecurity incidents, their use allows fully automating the Threat Intelligence reporting process in an organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ibrahim, I. M., Soliman, M., & Ossama, S. (2025). Leveraging large language models for document analysis and decision-making in AI chatbots. Advanced Sciences and Technology Journal, 2(1), Article 1034. https://doi.org/10.21608/astj.2025.342484.1034

Voitsekhovskyi, A., Stopochkina, I., Sun, P., Xie, J., Ilin, M., & Novikov, O. (2026). Detection of vulnerabilities in software for unmanned aerial vehicles by using large language models. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(2), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.352029

Fezari, M., & Al Dahoud, A. (2026). The evolution of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in AI [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27107.62245

Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union. (2022). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022L2555

Cyber Solidarity Act. (2024). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32025R0038

Cichonski, P., Millar, T., Grance, T., & Scarfone, K. (2012). Computer security incident handling guide (NIST Special Publication 800-61 Rev. 2). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.800-61r2

Ainslie, S., Thompson, D., Maynard, S., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Cyber-threat intelligence for security decision-making: A review and research agenda for practice. Computers & Security, 132, 103352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103352

Lin, X., et al. (2025). IRCopilot: Automated incident response with large language models (arXiv:2505.20945) [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.20945

Novikov, O., Ilin, M., Stopochkina, I., Ovcharuk, M., & Voitsekhovskyi, A. (2025). Application of LLM in UAV route planning tasks to prevent data exchange availability violations. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 1(29), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.29.892

Sohi, S., Balan, D., Anjomshoaa, A., & Polleres, A. (2024). Towards harmonised rail safety knowledge: LLM techniques for EU accident report processing. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-4079/short4.pdf

MISP Project. (2025). Features of MISP, the open source threat sharing platform. Retrieved October 30, 2025, from https://www.misp-project.org/features/

Dulaunoy, A., & Iklody, A. (n.d.). MISP core format. MISP Standard. https://www.misp-standard.org/rfc/misp-standard-core.html

Rutkowski, A., Kadobayashi, Y., & Furey, I. (2010). CYBEX: The cybersecurity information exchange framework. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(5).

OASIS Open. (n.d.). STIX introductory walkthrough. https://oasis-open.github.io/cti-documentation/stix/walkthrough

State Service for Special Communications and Information Protection of Ukraine. (2023). On approval of methodological recommendations for responding by cybersecurity subjects to various types of events in cyberspace (Order No. 570). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0570519-23#Text

FIRST. (n.d.). Traffic light protocol. https://www.first.org/tlp/

OpenAI. (n.d.). Structured model outputs.

Leto, A., Aguerrebere, C., & Bhati, I. (2024). Toward optimal search and retrieval for RAG (arXiv:2411.07396) [Preprint]. NeurIPS 2024 Workshop. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.07396

Chornyi, A., & Stopochkina, I. (2025). Graph-based analysis of information flows in Telegram for cybersecurity threat detection. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 3(27), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.27.746

Downloads


Abstract views: 4

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Andreiev, D., Chornyi, A., Stopochkina, I., & Ilin, M. (2026). METHODOLOGY FOR AUTOMATING CYBER INCIDENT REPORTS USING LLM. Electronic Professional Scientific Journal «Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique», 1(33), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2026.33.1156