METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE RESILIENCE OF CRITICAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECTS OF THE STATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.29.944Keywords:
critical infrastructure, critical information infrastructure objects, cybersecurity, resilience, resilience assessment, fuzzy analysis, risk management, criticality, criticality categoriesAbstract
In the modern context of increasing number and complexity of threats, the issue of assessing the resilience of critical information infrastructure (CII) objects becomes of paramount importance for the national security of the state. The vulnerability of infrastructural systems, combined with intersectoral dependencies, necessitates the application of integrated and scientifically grounded approaches to the assessment of CII and the enhancement of their resilience. The article presents an integrated method for assessing the resilience of CII, which combines a multidimensional system of indicators, fuzzy analysis methods, unified variable normalization, and categorization of objects in accordance with current regulatory documents. For the first time, the resilience life cycle model (P–A–A–R) has been integrated into the assessment process, enabling a dual calculation of the criticality category: the primary one – based on the integral indicator PKOKI, and the secondary one – taking into account the system’s ability to predict, absorb impacts, adapt, and recover. An experimental study conducted on the example of three resilience dimensions (economic, social, and security) confirmed the priority of the security aspect while simultaneously demonstrating the significance of economic and social factors in shaping a balanced system. The results of the study have practical value for state and private entities responsible for protecting critical infrastructure, as they provide a foundation for strategic risk management and the development of adaptive policies. Further research will be aimed at verifying the method across all dimensions of resilience for different cities of the state in order to confirm its universality and scalability.
Downloads
References
Law of Ukraine «On Critical Infrastructure» (2021). No. 1882-IX. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1882-20
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2021). Resolution No. 1109 «Certain issues of ensuring the security and resilience of critical infrastructure» (October 9, 2021). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1109-2021-%D0%BF
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2022). Resolution No. 518 «On approval of the criteria for classifying objects by categories of criticality» (May 13, 2022). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/518-2022-%D0%BF
Plakhotnyuk, R. V. (2024). Ensuring the resilience of critical infrastructure in Ukraine under modern challenges. Economic Space, 195, 47–54. https://economic-prostir.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/195-47-54-plahotnyuk.pdf
Herasymenko, O. M. (2024). Threats to critical infrastructure objects of Ukraine under martial law. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 84(3). https://visnyk-juris-uzhnu.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/41-2.pdf
Tretiakov, O. V., Khalmuradov, B. D., Kichata, N. M., & Remska, A. V. (2025). An approach to quantitative assessment of the resilience of critical infrastructure objects. Control, Navigation and Communication Systems, 1(79), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.26906/SUNZ.2025.1.178-183
Shkuropadska, D. (2025). Institutional support for the resilience of critical infrastructure. Scientia Fructuosa (KNUTE). https://journals.knute.edu.ua/scientia-fructuosa/article/view/2225
Sokiran, M. V. (2020). The system of principles of administrative and legal support for the resilience of Ukraine’s critical information infrastructure. Scientific Notes. Series: Law, 8(Special Issue), 73–77. https://cusu.edu.ua/images/nauk_zapiski/pravo/8_spec_2020/73-77.pdf
Sukhodolia, O. M. (2024). Resilience of critical energy infrastructure and community life: Analytical report. Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies. https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2024-05/ad_sukhodolia_resilience_29052024.pdf
Trump, B. D., Mitoulis, S., Argyroudis, S., Kiker, G., Palma-Oliveira, J., Horton, R., Pescaroli, G., Pinigina, E., Trump, J., & Linkov, I. (2025). Threat-agnostic resilience: Framing and application for critical infrastructure. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01318
Huang, L., Chen, J., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Distributed and optimal resilient planning of large-scale interdependent critical infrastructures. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.02231
Noor, A. F. M., Moghavvemi, S., & Tajudeen, F. P. (2025). Identifying key factors of cybersecurity readiness in organizations: Insights from Malaysian critical infrastructure. Computers & Security, 159, 104674.
Rehak, D., Flynnova, L., Hromada, M., & Fuggini, C. (2023). The importance of resistance in the context of critical infrastructure resilience: An extension of the CIERA method. Systems, 11(10), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11100506
Alizadeh, H., Sharifi, A., Kamelifar, M. J., et al. (2023). A study on the sustainability of urban transportation in Iranian metropolitan areas. Transportation in Developing Economies, 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-023-00178-7
Sydorenko, V., & Maksymets, A. (2025). A model for ensuring the resilience of critical information systems under the influence of internal and external destabilizing factors. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technology, 3(27), 560–571. https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.27.779
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Вікторія Сидоренко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.